1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Mini Metro weights approximately 4 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | Mini Metro | AZ |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2370 mm |
