1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2002 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 1196 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder (359 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2002 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Mini Metro | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 81.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 80 L |