1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,091 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 ZAZ Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 ZAZ Wagon (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Mini Metro weights approximately 2 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Austin | ZAZ |
| Model | Mini Metro | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2330 mm |
