1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2003 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Armada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1257 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2003 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | Mini Metro | Armada |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 747 kg | 2004 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4310 mm |