1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (127 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Mini Metro | Megane |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 127 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 70 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |