1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2004 BMW 325
To start off, 2004 BMW 325 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 325 (184 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 325 weights approximately 841 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 325 (237 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2004 BMW 325 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | Mini Metro | 325 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 184 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 63 L |