1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2004 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 822 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2004 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Mini Metro | Sebring |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 61 L |