1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1083 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (343 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Mini Metro | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 203 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1837 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 95 L |
