1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2005 Chevrolet Spark
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Spark weights approximately 22 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1980 Austin Mini Metro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2005 Chevrolet Spark | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Mini Metro | Spark |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 796 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 776 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 35 L |