1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | Mini Metro | 300 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 3516 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |
