1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 432 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1718 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 594 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | Mini Metro | Ram |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 8276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 494 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 691 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 101 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 2472 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 98 L |
