1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 431 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 1176 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL (700 Nm) has 603 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Mini Metro | CL |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 5441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 700 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 88 L |