1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (153 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 759 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Austin | Mercury |
| Model | Mini Metro | Sable |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 252 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1513 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |
