1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2005 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2005 Toyota Highlander is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Highlander (230 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 876 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Highlander (328 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2005 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Mini Metro | Highlander |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 328 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 73 L |