1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2005 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2005 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro should accelerate faster than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Mini Metro weights approximately 9 kg more than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2005 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Austin | ZAZ |
Model | Mini Metro | Wagon |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2330 mm |