1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2006 BMW 323
To start off, 2006 BMW 323 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 2006 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 323 (230 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2006 BMW 323 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | Mini Metro | 323 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2497 cc |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 63 L |
