1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Mini Metro has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Mini Metro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Austin | SsangYong |
Model | Mini Metro | Stavic |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 80 L |