1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,358 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (154 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Camry (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | Mini Metro | Camry |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2358 cc |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 88.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
