1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 2007 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (73 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Mini Metro | Commodore |
Year Released | 1980 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |