1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 781 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Austin | Rover |
Model | Mini Metro | 75 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 97 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 65 L |