1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | Mini Metro | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
