1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (45 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (73 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2009 Ford Ka | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Mini Metro | Ka |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |