1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Austin Mini Metro should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Austin Mini Metro (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1980 Austin Mini Metro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Mini Metro | Clio |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |