1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | Mini Metro | C70 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |