1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Mini Metro | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2490 mm |
