1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 697 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Austin | Volvo |
| Model | Mini Metro | C30 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |
