1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 1,257 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Mini Metro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Mini Metro | Micra |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 97 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 46 L |