1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2012 Scion tC
To start off, 2012 Scion tC is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Scion tC (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Scion tC (234 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2012 Scion tC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2012 Scion tC | |
Make | Austin | Scion |
Model | Mini Metro | tC |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 97 Nm | 234 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |