1980 Austin Mini Metro vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Mini Metro would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (62 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1158 kg more than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. (97 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Austin Mini Metro. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Mini Metro has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Mini Metro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Mini Metro | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Mini Metro | XTS |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1257 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 11.5 |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 754 kg | 1912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2837 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 76 L |
