1980 Austin Princess vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1980 Austin Princess is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 496 kg more than 1980 Austin Princess.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Princess | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Austin | Hudson |
| Model | Princess | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3160 mm |
