1980 Austin Princess vs. 1969 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1980 Austin Princess is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Princess weights approximately 250 kg more than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 1969 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Princess | Colt |
Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2360 mm |