1980 Austin Princess vs. 1969 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1980 Austin Princess is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Princess weights approximately 245 kg more than 1969 Triumph 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 1969 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Princess | 1300 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 61 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2460 mm |