1980 Austin Princess vs. 1970 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1980 Austin Princess is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1036 kg more than 1980 Austin Princess.
Because 1970 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Princess | 1970 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Princess | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3390 mm |
