1980 Austin Princess vs. 1972 Austin 2200
To start off, 1980 Austin Princess is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 21 kg more than 1980 Austin Princess.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 1972 Austin 2200 | |
Make | Austin | Austin |
Model | Princess | 2200 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2227 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1181 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |