1980 Austin Princess vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Ranger |
Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4690 mm |