1980 Austin Princess vs. 1986 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Princess weights approximately 10 kg more than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 1986 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Princess | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2580 mm |