1980 Austin Princess vs. 2002 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 135 kg more than 1980 Austin Princess.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 2002 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Econovan |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2210 mm |