1980 Austin Princess vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 440 kg more than 1980 Austin Princess.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Princess | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |