1980 Austin Princess vs. 2003 Jaguar R-D6
To start off, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar R-D6 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1980 Austin Princess.
Because 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar R-D6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 2003 Jaguar R-D6 | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | Princess | R-D6 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2720 mm |