1980 Austin Princess vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Austin Princess weights approximately 430 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2003 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Austin | MCC |
Model | Princess | Smart |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2370 mm |