1980 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Princess | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Princess | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2490 mm |
