1980 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 405 kg more than 1980 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Princess | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Austin | Mercury |
| Model | Princess | Sable |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2760 mm |
