1980 Austin Princess vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Austin Princess | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Austin | Land Rover |
Model | Princess | LR2 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2180 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2670 mm |