1980 Austin Princess vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1670 kg more than 1980 Austin Princess.
Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Ford E-Series has automatic transmission and 1980 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1980 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford E-Series will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Austin Princess | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Princess | E-Series |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2111 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3505 mm |
