1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1952 Peugeot 203
To start off, 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Peugeot 203 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Peugeot 203 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1952 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 1952 Peugeot 203 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Peugeot |
| Model | A 112 | 203 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |
