1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1953 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1480 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 1953 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Autobianchi | Humber |
Model | A 112 | Pullman |
Year Released | 1980 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |