1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Lotus Elan weights approximately 36 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Lotus |
| Model | A 112 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 696 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |
