1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1968 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 742 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 1968 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Autobianchi | Chevrolet |
Model | A 112 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1402 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |