1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1994 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1994 Toyota MR2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Toyota MR2 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1994 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 1994 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Toyota |
| Model | A 112 | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |
