1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 726 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Mazda |
Model | A 112 | 626 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 58 L |